Question for Robert Milnes and Request for Tiffany Briscoe
First, let me say, thank you both for volunteering to represent the party. I have one question for Mr. Milnes and a request for Tiffany Briscoe.
Mr. Milnes,
You said in the debate that you were banned from IPR. What were the circumstances surrounding this ban?
Tiffany,
Can you provide a photo of yourself and/or prove that you are in fact above 35 years of age?





Comments
Tiffany Briscoe:
Well I don't know how to prove it besides giving you my birth certificate. I was born on January 31, 1976 in Baltimore, if this helps. I am 35, indeed.
As for my picture, I will soon be putting up pictures of myself on my website. I just have a small technical problem that doesn't allow me to upload pictures on my computer, but since I'm getting a new one soon, no problem. (I am sorry for the inconvenience, though).
But don't believe I am some stranger out of nowhere. You can read this article about me: http://www.cambridgepublicrelations.com/tiffany-briscoe
NewFederalist:
Is the photo posted at IPR really you? I am just curious since nobody seems to know who you are and what you look like.
William S. Saturn:
I'm sorry and I say this with all due respect possible, but you have provided basically nothing that you even exist. We can't wait for proof until after the nomination process.
I'm having trouble understanding your failure to provide photos. Are you the only person with photos of yourself?Do you only have access to one computer? This is very confusing because it seems unreasonable that you would not be able to upload photos from a library or from a friend's computer.
This concern may seem petty, but let me remind you that you are running to be the face of this party. The face of this party cannot be faceless.
Robert Milnes:
I would be glad to describe the circumstances of my being banned from commenting in IPR-from my perspective of course. I think only I and our own John Ogle are the only ones banned from further commenting.
I believe it was mostly paulie's doing. The rationale was that I-and Ogle-commented inappropriately in quantity and quality in threads which did not directly relate to the topic that should be generated. Allegedly there were so many complaints that paulie proposed dedicated threads for PLAS and U.S. Parliament. Also for petitioner's complaints. I objected. Tom K. talked about a "slippery slope". The thread petetred out & paulie started construing many of my comments as PLAS related and started deleting. One day he deleted virtually as soon as I posted finally culminating in him declaring that I was banned in that I had threatened to "spam" IPR. This was not true. A distortion of what I actually said. When I requested my comment be reposted so readers could judge for themselves, paulie said the comment went into automatic permanent deletion.
The whole thing is lame. paulie disagrees with PLAS and had sufficient influence at IPR to slowly suppress it. Naturally when asked to support paulie or contravene the owners of IPR, who are rightists, did nothing. paulie is a free workhorse there. & the old saying that when your political enemies get into trouble, don't help them.
Since then I have noted how similar this is to the changing of The Nolan Resolution into it's exact opposite, The Amended Nolan Resolution. Known rightist LP Secretary Alicia Mattson was deeply involved. I suggested that the Resolution could have been sent to a rightist think tank for analysis which created the Amendment. Similarly segregation of PLAS to its own thread could have been determined by a rightistb think tank as the best way to subtly suppress it.
I have requested my and Ogle's commenting priviliges be restored. I have called for an investigation into paulie and IPR. I have suggested that a libertarian owned alternative to IPR be established.
I have made many such calls and suggestions. Very little has been done or changed. Perhaps if I get the BTP nomination and seek the LP nomination of the BTP ticket and then the GP nomination, I can get some action going.
Note that I have determined that we do not want or need the Constitution Party participation with PLAS.
NewFederalist:
This is a good place for dialogue since you are banned at IPR.
NewFederalist:
Isn't Ogle's name James not John?
southernpatriot:
Yes, it is.
paulie:
Robert,
Stop misrepresenting facts.
Someone who writes for IPR is the person you think is me. I have told you before that I am not saying whether I know who it was.
William S. Saturn:
Thank you for answering the question.